Hello Rob, thanks for your perspective and insights :-) In your last sentence you speak of thought, limitation, and something that " emerges ". Is this roughly what you meant, that human thought, encounters its limitations in understanding the complexities before it, then compensates, by moving in a direction of the creation of various " belief systems ", within which, total accuracy of thought, is not a pre-requisite, since the validation of the system of thinking, relies on various forms of faith. Much simpler for an organism to contend with, than compared to finding ultimate, accurate, absolute, truths. Perhaps you meant something differant that what I suggested, and I would be interested in hearing your accounting, if I have missed your point. I do find it quite fascinating, how our minds, of seeming similiar biology on the surface, still contain something about its nature, in the finest sense, that allows for the amazingly diverse landscapes of thought and perspective, that we see illustrated within the peoples of our world. Some component of the population, are merely presenting a facade, when it comes to professing what is thier proposed beliefs, or what justifies thier actions are. But a great portion also, seem to clearly " hold as true ", the particular system they put thier " faith " in. It seems to me, that every system that propose finite explanations for existance, uses " faith " to one degree or another. Even science puts " faith " in the notion that repeatable experiments, provide some idea of absolute " proofs " regarding given ideas. But repetition does not define what can happen" for sure ", outside the Tiny Bubble of the experiences of the human organism, which is indescribably small, if the universe, and time, are infinte.
