All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

December 29, 2003 01:25AM
Would someone please print here the person and address to write, to protest the closing of Deep Creek? I admit I don't feel like looking for it all over the web site, so could someone please copy it here?

I think that it is absolutely true that it is safer to have responsible people visiting the springs than having it closed so that only scofflaws, especially those who might build a fire, will visit it.

As for trash, I always carry some out in addition to my own, and if I saw someone with a fire, I would report it to the Park service.

I am waiting a while longer to see if they open the Springs, but if they don't open it in a reasonable time or convince me there is a very good reason not to, I will have to consider breaking the law. The springs belong to the people, and I consider myself a human being.

I do think that they could put signs up or block trails off, with threat of heavy fines, to keep people out of the dangerous parts of the forest. One time in the past, I visited the Springs, not knowing it was closed, and though there was a small piece of paper posted at the Bowen ranch entrance, I figured, "Well, if it's REALLY closed, there will be a sign up at the entrance way telling us so". (Admittedly I did not want to believe it was, as I had just driven 2 and 1/2 hours to arrive there, and was looking forward to a hot soak) There was no official sign, so I entered, and I wasn't the only one there.

I think if the Forest Service is serious about closing the forest they should at least put up a real sign at all known entrances!

But the bottom line is, if they are going to keep DCHS closed, they should have good reason to do so and they should make a case for that, to us, the people who use it and especially those who help care for it.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

DC still visited despite closure

Sam D. 1110December 22, 2003 02:07PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

sycamorelaughing 759December 22, 2003 05:49PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Rick 780December 23, 2003 01:12AM

Burn Area Report

Hammock-key 696December 23, 2003 02:51PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 724December 29, 2003 01:25AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 776December 29, 2003 12:40PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 672January 02, 2004 02:00PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

LaughingBear 624December 22, 2003 09:37PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Arizona Mike 703December 23, 2003 09:33AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 703December 23, 2003 11:29AM

Little Caliente report for Paul P.

Sam D. 726December 23, 2003 03:14PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Arizona Mike 894December 23, 2003 04:19PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 688December 23, 2003 04:41PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 678December 29, 2003 06:22PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 769January 02, 2004 02:22PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 694January 03, 2004 04:59AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 746January 03, 2004 08:39PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 778January 05, 2004 03:43AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 806January 05, 2004 12:31PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 1163January 05, 2004 04:39PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

sycamorelaughing 704January 04, 2004 10:38AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login