Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waning Gibbous (92% of Full)


Advanced

Burn Area Report

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

December 23, 2003 02:51PM
From personal experience, I have hiked some of the "burned out" areas, Squints Ranch, PCT South of Splinters Cabin, Cedar Glen, & Cajon Mnt. as well as the "restricted areas" of The Pinnacles, Bradford Ridge Trail, and Millers Canyon in Silverwood. This is only slightly less illegal than the general public because one of my hiking buddies is a volunteer for the forest service assisting with re-forestation since the Willow Fire, but still civil disobedient nonetheless but IMO not immoral or unethical.

The only severely damaged/dangereous area that I have seen is the PCT bridge over Deep Creek just south of Splinters cabin. The bridge is very dangereous with the last fifteen feet missing because of a downed burned tree. My dog almost fell off with a drop of about twenty feet to the bottom. This would be about 5 miles south of the Springs. The rest of the trails are still well marked with only minimal damage around the hospital from loggers. Quite a few of the burned trees have been downed, I can onlly assume from the fire fighting efforts because no recent activity from the forest service have been done. As for danger to public I see very little, but if they lift the ban I can imagine the traffic of lookey loos with minimal hiking experieince and this could be a liability the forest service is not wanting.

It is quite sad the damage to the forest and the "moon scaped" look of the terrain of the burn areas. I am most concerned about conditions during the rainy season of Midwinter and Spring thaws. We might find that Deep Creek might be loaded with ashes and burn materials that could be hazordous to fauna and flora as well as troublesome to those primates that frequent the springs. But nothing is being done about the erosion issue on the less populated North side of the mountain. So my guess is that they are going to let nature take its course and toll. Which ironically, human meddleing with nature (fire supresssion, tree density, and missmanaged forest) is one of main causes of this dissaster.

As for the closure of the Springs, I have seen no signs informing people (Bradford Trail) and apparently very little enforcement. On my few visits to the springs, I was surprised at the number of people who have been either civil disobedient or ignorant - my guess is the latter from discussions with some visitors. As for the condition of the springs, every thing seems normal and relatively clean. The damaged Anniversary pool has been repaired and the PVC drain pipe recovered. It actually has been nice with less crowds and more solitude.

HMK
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

DC still visited despite closure

Sam D. 1337December 22, 2003 02:07PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

sycamorelaughing 865December 22, 2003 05:49PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Rick 885December 23, 2003 01:12AM

Burn Area Report

Hammock-key 827December 23, 2003 02:51PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 830December 29, 2003 01:25AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 890December 29, 2003 12:40PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 782January 02, 2004 02:00PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

LaughingBear 729December 22, 2003 09:37PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Arizona Mike 810December 23, 2003 09:33AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 803December 23, 2003 11:29AM

Little Caliente report for Paul P.

Sam D. 827December 23, 2003 03:14PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Arizona Mike 998December 23, 2003 04:19PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 787December 23, 2003 04:41PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 781December 29, 2003 06:22PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

miguelbgood 875January 02, 2004 02:22PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 796January 03, 2004 04:59AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 857January 03, 2004 08:39PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Ron 883January 05, 2004 03:43AM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 915January 05, 2004 12:31PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

Paul P. 1302January 05, 2004 04:39PM

Re: DC still visited despite closure

sycamorelaughing 810January 04, 2004 10:38AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login