All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

June 09, 2002 01:56PM
Deep Creek is an isolated area, known as not patrolled and lawless to the community, therefore, I believe attracts lawlessness in some regard.

The spillway area has been permanently closed and I have heard numerous stories about what used to occur over there. These people who did these violent acts and vandalized vehicles are still somewhere out there.

I know the individuals in the village and over the years the community has improved in character. The majority of the current owners either own property or rent their homes. Most of them have jobs, some are on disability.

There are two residents who like the alcohol, their appearance and small reflect this. However, these two individuals are by reputation, harmless. They hitchike to the local community and therefore have visibility. I think every community has some of these individuals.

The person who has most of the junk cars is someone who has a good paying job. He has a huge collection of volvos. In my opinion, this guy is intelligent and nonconforming. So, you have some individuals who are taking advantage of the isolated area as a place to store cars.

However, the state law concerning code enforcement calls for improving neighborhoods and assisting people with this goal. It talks about when heavy code enforcement is going to be conducted in a low income area, they are to offer financial assistance to bring these homes into compliance.

The tone of the law is not punitive in nature, its intentions appear to want neighborhoods to be improved and to keep people in their homes.

However, in San Bernardino County this practice is outrageous. More information about these practices in San Bernardino County will be added to the link shortly. What is going on is shocking, unbelievable and violates state law and the United States Constitution.

The Bureau of Land Management has said more than once that they want to acquire private land in this area. The 1995 plan had provisions to purchase private land. The new plan also calls for acquiring private land. The Bureau of Land Management again stated this in court documents.

Now there is a process for this called condemnation. When land is deemed to have a higher public use, therefore, the Government can gain title through condemnation. The Government has to pay full market value for the property.

They were putting huge cable up Fawskin road. Appeared to be communication cable. Based on my knowledge of San Bernardino County, there are plans for this area. I am just not quite sure what they are as of yet.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

Theft at JF3

Dorothy 1317June 04, 2002 12:29PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Naked Man 722June 04, 2002 01:43PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Dorothy 688June 04, 2002 06:09PM

Re: Theft at JF3

katrina island 705June 04, 2002 06:57PM

Re: Theft at JF3

mp 701June 04, 2002 11:39PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Wizard 733June 05, 2002 08:37AM

Re: Theft at JF3

Wizard 681June 05, 2002 08:50AM

Re: Theft at JF3

mp 648June 05, 2002 10:12AM

Re: Theft at JF3

EastBay 683June 05, 2002 12:55PM

Re: Theft at JF3

katrina island 752June 05, 2002 03:07PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Rick 714June 05, 2002 03:09PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Wizard 677June 05, 2002 09:17PM

Re: Theft at JF3

mikki 702June 05, 2002 10:47PM

Re: Theft at JF3

mikki 655June 05, 2002 10:51PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Wizard 722June 06, 2002 07:55AM

Re: Theft at JF3

Paul P. 659June 06, 2002 12:20PM

Re: Theft at JF3

mikki 640June 07, 2002 08:14AM

Re: Theft at JF3

Arizona Mike 688June 08, 2002 11:40PM

Re: Theft at JF3

katrina island 809June 09, 2002 01:56PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Dorothy 1165June 11, 2002 04:50PM

Re: Theft at JF3

Wizard 699June 06, 2002 08:20PM

Re: Theft at JF3

earthealing1 752June 07, 2002 10:19PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login