Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waning Crescent (15% of Full)


Advanced

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

February 25, 2004 09:17AM
Yes Katrina....the crow was quite tasty. There is plenty left over if you care to try some :0 ). I believe that you have access to the Management Plan for the Juniper Flats Cultural Area from 1988 as in the past you have posted excerpts from it on this site. Pre existing routes are clearly indicated on page 8. The one route that went down to my old mining claim was closed at this time and has remained so. Open routes within the ACEC are clearly designated on this map as well. J1299 was created illegaly by local motorcycle riders in recent times and traverses an old burial site and major center for pre columbian native american living dating back over 10,000 years. The ACEC was created to prevent the kind of damage that is occuring today. RS 2477 does not apply to J1299. It was not even proposed as a route of any kind until the public WEMO comment period closed last summer! Since ACEC routes designations are part of the ACEC management plan, they are excluded from WEMO route designation.

On the other hand, the old Moss Mill Road to the USFS parking area was in existance prior to 1976. When I was staying there, it was a main route of travel for those who were seeking to avoid the Bowen Ranch toll gate and its operator, the infamous Gary Growler. It was around 1976/1977 when I was staying there. The Ware family had moved on and Lyle and Annie were living in the main house. I was staying in the little windmill shack that later was used by William as the lookout for his structure.

Although I am not a big fan of the RS2477 claims in the Mojave Desert area,it appears the Moss Mill Road would apply for eligibility due to its longstanding continued use by the public prior to 1976. The issues surrounding the Moss Mill Road and J1299 are completly different. J1299 is illegal because it disturbes a cultural site in defiance of federal laws. Moss Mill Road was closed at the request of a local property owner over tresspass issues. It appears that both routes are subject to court interpetation. In the interm, local OHV thugs are intentionaly destroying a cultural site. Our local volunteers are documenting and observing.

SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

quid pro Castro?

mojavegreen 1654February 23, 2004 06:39PM

Re: quid pro Castro?

Wizard 904February 23, 2004 10:27PM

Re: quid pro Castro?

mojavegreen 814February 24, 2004 01:17AM

Re: quid pro Castro?

mojavegreen 781February 24, 2004 11:32AM

Castro's OHV event in '93

mojavegreen 750February 24, 2004 11:48AM

Re: Castro's OHV event in '93

Rick 731February 24, 2004 11:50AM

Emergency closure

mojavegreen 744February 24, 2004 12:03PM

Open Route Network

mojavegreen 773February 24, 2004 12:13PM

OHV connectivity?

mojavegreen 811February 24, 2004 12:22PM

quid pro Castro-J1299 for J1021

mojavegreen 838February 24, 2004 12:37PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

Rick 858February 24, 2004 12:50PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

mojavegreen 688February 24, 2004 05:28PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

Paul P. 838February 24, 2004 05:37PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

Rick 754February 24, 2004 06:34PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

mojavegreen 779February 24, 2004 06:45PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

Rick 754February 24, 2004 06:33PM

Re: OHV connectivity?

katrina island 848February 25, 2004 02:07AM

Re: OHV connectivity?

mojavegreen 834February 25, 2004 11:46AM

Re: quid pro Castro?

LaughingBear 797February 24, 2004 06:28PM

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

LaughingBear 1429February 25, 2004 09:17AM

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

Arizona Mike 825February 25, 2004 09:56AM

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

Arizona Mike 960February 25, 2004 10:00AM

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

Wizard 750February 25, 2004 12:28PM

Re: J1299 excluded from RS2477

Rick 745February 25, 2004 01:35PM

Re: quid pro Castro?

DCR 834February 25, 2004 11:14AM

Re: quid pro Castro?

Wizard 769February 25, 2004 11:24AM

Re: quid pro Castro?

Wizard 771February 25, 2004 11:33AM

mangled posts?

Rick 763February 25, 2004 01:37PM

Re: mangled posts?

mojavegreen 834February 25, 2004 02:25PM

Re: quid pro Castro?

Paul P. 734February 26, 2004 05:13PM

Re: quid pro Castro?

Wizard 834February 26, 2004 08:24PM

Proper authorities? Nelson?

mojavegreen 1248February 26, 2004 11:51PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login