All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

April 11, 2003 07:04AM
Laughing Bear, I agree with you totally that OHV should be kept to the specific designated areas. Just the same way that in our lakes and rivers there are sections assigned to swimming and others to boating, we all need to learn to show respect to other people's rights, but they need to respect ours as well. A "screw'em" attitude should not acceptable by any group towards another.

In regards the the Wild and Scenic designation, the USFS clarified that while this would still allow for foot access, it would establish a quota system, so we would need to obtain a specific permit for each time we visit the springs. This would be a hassle for the users and an administration nightmare for the USFS. I am sure they would have better ways to use their resources.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

BLM WEMO OHV plans

LaughingBear 1212April 06, 2003 10:09PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

katrina island 781April 07, 2003 01:07AM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

LaughingBear 779April 07, 2003 08:41AM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

sycamorelaughing 624April 07, 2003 02:22PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

Celtfire 682April 07, 2003 03:13PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

Wizard 742April 07, 2003 10:54PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

Ron 925April 11, 2003 07:04AM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

OnanySunday 610April 08, 2003 09:46PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

LaughingBear 678April 09, 2003 06:20AM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

Rick 744April 11, 2003 01:22PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

katrina island 684April 12, 2003 06:32PM

Re: BLM WEMO OHV plans

LaughingBear 1237April 12, 2003 10:16PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login