Who is Ranger Nelson? What authority does he represent? Is he the final arbiter of what constitutes "credible witnesses"? Or is there a "higher court" to determine this?
Is Ranger Nelson personally involved somehow in the outcome? If he's not involved, why would he say that all 25 witnesses are not credible, unless he's right [in his official opinion]?
How are these allegations against Mike relevant to a BLM meeting? Seems these are CIVIL/PENAL Code issues more appropriate for the local Sheriff's department.
All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner
of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion
and not fact until verified independently.
| Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| katrina | 1153 | April 11, 2002 11:45PM |
| Wizard | 711 | April 12, 2002 08:47AM |
| Naked Man | 673 | April 14, 2002 09:40AM |
| katrina | 566 | April 14, 2002 09:59PM |
| Paul P. | 639 | April 14, 2002 10:27PM |
| katrina | 644 | April 16, 2002 01:49AM |
| Wizard | 975 | April 16, 2002 08:51AM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
