Who is Ranger Nelson? What authority does he represent? Is he the final arbiter of what constitutes "credible witnesses"? Or is there a "higher court" to determine this?
Is Ranger Nelson personally involved somehow in the outcome? If he's not involved, why would he say that all 25 witnesses are not credible, unless he's right [in his official opinion]?
How are these allegations against Mike relevant to a BLM meeting? Seems these are CIVIL/PENAL Code issues more appropriate for the local Sheriff's department.