Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (100% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC44

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

July 01, 2007 11:13PM
Mojavegreen, Photographs taken just after the " supposed " Jet liner impact at the Pentagon, show a roundish, aprox 20 foot hole in the outside wall of the Pentagon, and directly adjacent windows to the impact site, are even intact. There is no evidence of the debris of a full sized jet liner crash seen anywhere on the grass area in front of the impact point, with also no scarring of the grass area of any kind. The subsequent fire weakened the the floors in the area of the impact and collapsed the exterior of the building up to the top levels, and this image is what was used to portray the damage to the Pentagon which could be " sold " to the unaware public as the impact damage of a full sized jet liner. If a full sized jet liner hit the Pentagon, it wouldn't disappear into a roundish 20 foot sized hole. Of all the video evidence purported to be held by the goverment that should clearly show what impacted the Pentagon, why has no video evidence been shown to the public, video that would show a full sized jet liner hitting the Pentagon? The government said the fire fromt he crash was so hot, that it essentially totally incinerated the full size Jet liner. This is impossible and totally ridiculous! Ask yourself, what pieces of this " supposed " full size jet liner was ever shown in the media as evidence of this crash. What was shown was just a few smallish piece's purported as parts of the exterior of the plane. Other items were taken away secretively wrapped in tarps, never to be seen again. A very large engine piece that was purported to be from the Jet Liner, was clearly shown to be a part from a completely differant type of much smaller military jet fighter. So how did that end up at the crash scene? The questions and inconsistancies with the " official story " are too numerous to even mention here. So if it can be established, by sensible information, that it is impossible that a full sized Jet Liner hit the Pentagon, then this does bring up the question, as you ask Mojavegreen, what then did happen to the "supposed " hijacked airliner, and its passengers? But the circumstance that this question you ask, appears to have no explanation at this time, does not negate the glaring and inconceivable inconsistancies in the " official version " of what impacted the Pentagon on 9-11.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC44

Wizard 976June 18, 2007 11:11PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 553June 23, 2007 11:37AM

Re: SC44

Wizard 578June 23, 2007 12:51PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 536June 23, 2007 12:54PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 543June 23, 2007 01:18PM

Re: SC44

mojavegreen 558June 24, 2007 10:36AM

Re: SC44

Wizard 573June 23, 2007 01:49PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 541June 23, 2007 01:53PM

Unexpected Event-the Great Simoon

mojavegreen 676June 24, 2007 10:50AM

Re: SC44

Wizard 650June 25, 2007 02:55PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 549June 29, 2007 10:25PM

Re: SC44

mojavegreen 590July 01, 2007 10:33PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 521June 29, 2007 10:53PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 577June 29, 2007 11:34PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 536June 29, 2007 11:53PM

Re: SC44

mojavegreen 589July 01, 2007 10:58PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 507July 01, 2007 11:13PM

Re: SC44

mojavegreen 632July 03, 2007 10:56AM

Re: SC44

Wizard 533July 01, 2007 11:20PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 674July 02, 2007 09:35PM

Re: SC44

Wizard 1062July 03, 2007 12:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login