Re: EZ, Rick, please don't get emotional.

Willa Zoe wrote:

> Rick wrote: "So, Willa, you're the judge now? Last I heard it
> was up to the judge to determine whether the plaintiff
> established his claim."
>
> Rick, you need to follow the thread and not jump around. The
> thread dealt with an earlier statement: "...the judge might
> actually have to finally determine where the Bowen Ranch
> property line is, to solve this case."

You made an absolute statement that the plaitiff failed to make his case even though you were not at the hearing. I do not see how that has anything to do with wizard's joke about the property line.

> No, I wasn't there at trial

Then why are you making claims about the plaitiff failing to make his case when you are lacking critical information.

> jobe earlier wrote: "In court Mike told the judge Scardino was
> on BLM land." "Scardino was unable to articulate to the judge
> where he was."

Heresay.

> The "claim" being discussed in the thread dealt with the claim
> of whether Scardino was on Mike Castro's property or not; not
> the (overall) case claim against Castro.

Your wording implies otherwise.

> Scardino in trying to hold Castro responsible, held the legal
> duty to prove with a legal proponderance of evidence his claim
> that the damage was done on Castro's property.

You a first year law student?