All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

February 16, 2004 02:05PM
846. An owner of any estate or any other interest in real property, whether possessory or nonpossessory, owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for any recreational purpose or to give any warning of hazardous conditions, uses of, structures, or activities on such premises to persons entering for such purpose, except as provided in this section.

A "recreational purpose," as used in this section, includes such activities as fishing, hunting, camping, water sports, hiking, spelunking, sport parachuting, riding, including animal riding, snowmobiling, and all other types of vehicular riding, rock collecting, sightseeing, picnicking, nature study, nature contacting, recreational gardening, gleaning, hang gliding, winter sports, and viewing or enjoying historical, archaeological, scenic, natural, or scientific sites.

An owner of any estate or any other interest in real property, whether possessory or nonpossessory, who gives permission to another for entry or use for the above purpose upon the premises does not thereby (a) extend any assurance that the premises are safe for such purpose, or (b) constitute the person to whom permission has been granted the legal status of an invitee or licensee to whom a duty of care is owed, or (c) assume responsibility for or incur liability for any injury to person or property caused by any act of such person to whom permission has been granted except as provided in this section.

This section does not limit the liability which otherwise exists (a) for willful or malicious failure to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use, structure or activity; or (b) for injury suffered in any case where permission to enter for the above purpose was granted for a consideration other than the consideration, if any, paid to said landowner by the state, or where consideration has been received from others for the same purpose; or (c) to any persons who are expressly invited rather than merely permitted to come upon the premises by the landowner.

SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

LaughingBear 1160February 16, 2004 02:35AM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

sycamorelaughing 675February 16, 2004 07:44AM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Gary 638February 16, 2004 01:21PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Rick 597February 16, 2004 01:54PM

The Law Places a Duty

katrina island 659February 16, 2004 01:59PM

Re: The Law Places a Duty

mojavegreen 710February 16, 2004 05:08PM

Re: The Law Places a Duty

Rick 636February 16, 2004 05:24PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Rick 732February 16, 2004 02:05PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

LaughingBear 620February 16, 2004 08:52PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

LaughingBear 646February 17, 2004 06:33AM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

mojavegreen 723February 17, 2004 09:29AM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Blue Corn 625February 17, 2004 11:51AM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

sycamorelaughing 812February 17, 2004 04:06PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

mojavegreen 668February 17, 2004 07:28PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

LaughingBear 923February 18, 2004 03:51PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Paul P. 687February 18, 2004 04:34PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

mojavegreen 695February 18, 2004 04:58PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

LaughingBear 603February 18, 2004 04:50PM

Re: Hotspringer Misfortune/Legal Liability

Paul P. 1132February 19, 2004 05:42PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login