jobe wrote:
> Continuance, that is legalese for option 1) delay. Five months
> of reviewing records is not enough ?
It's Dave's choice. Nobody is forcing him to wave his speedy trial right.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Rick | 1771 | March 10, 2009 08:28PM | |
jobe | 873 | March 11, 2009 05:47AM | |
Rick | 858 | March 11, 2009 02:43PM | |
jobe | 920 | March 11, 2009 04:09PM | |
Rick | 933 | May 09, 2009 07:54PM | |
LaughingBear | 1384 | May 10, 2009 09:44PM | |
Leslie Windham | 1070 | May 23, 2009 09:58PM | |
Rick | 846 | June 06, 2009 05:27PM | |
Rick | 844 | June 06, 2009 06:08PM | |
Leslie Windham | 838 | June 19, 2009 10:57PM | |
Rick | 823 | June 20, 2009 01:22AM | |
Paul P. | 850 | June 19, 2009 11:15PM | |
jobe | 892 | June 20, 2009 06:45AM | |
Rick | 1483 | June 20, 2009 01:51PM | |
Leslie Windham | 897 | June 20, 2009 06:50PM | |
Leslie Windham | 867 | June 20, 2009 08:24PM | |
Rick | 1659 | July 04, 2009 05:40PM |