Jesse, I respect that you express that you see Rchan's article in a differant light than I may. It appears that you do not wish to discuss your point of veiw on this topic here on the forum. Generally when people post on a forum, bantering over contrary points of veiw, the differant parties will go on to support thier arguments with some more, in depth, discussion. I hope you will understand that the observers of these post may question the merit of one who post in such fashion that indicates they disagree with anothers opinion but then say nothing further about why the disagree. I know there are those who say that this forum expresses a one sided veiw of the issues related to DCHS and specifically certain access concerns. That may be reality to some extent but the fact is this forum is open to all points of veiw and " all " sides need to take it upon themselves to join into the discussion. I know of two people who have been blocked for some period of time from posting here. Rick does the work in maintaining this forum so it is his decision of whether or not to block someones post. I personally think that all should be allowed to post opionions unless perhaps what they discusses expresses a physical threat to others posting here. If people were blocked for mere opinions then the discourse does begin to slide into the realm of a more specific groups opinions which would not be completely representative of the spirit of free speech. Hopefully in all these discussions a sense of civility will prevail like your words " I respectfully disagree ". Happy new year to all :-)
