I think that those who listen carefully to any information about the concerns suggested about Mike Castro should judge fairly what is the form of the information that is brought to light by various people, stories and things written. There certainly is nothing wrong with getting information from both parties in an argument. Katrina has her view of events based on her experience and I have no doubt that Mike Castro will give you his take on things Craig. If you have a discussion about these issues with Mike Castro then you Craig will develop your own interpretation of what you have heard, you will develop your inclination of what you think offers the most merit as explanations. Just remember that even you, at that point, will be making assumptions based on feelings about what you have learned or been told. Your assumptions will be based on information which will be based predominantly, if not solely, on things told to you, or something you have read, not hard, solid, verifiable facts. This is just the nature of the beast we are all dealing with. Hopefully through all of these discussions less aggressive, and more peaceful relations, will be realized between all affected parties.
