All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

August 13, 2007 10:33AM
It's a nice little closed-minded world you guys live in there, but it doesn't make it correct. Fact is, most land that is now closed is that way for three reasons:

1. Environmental groups using political might and money to have lands designated as Federal Wilderness.
2. Environmental groups using legal maneuvering (threats of lawsuits and judicial decrees) as a way of forcing land managers to abandon their charter to manage lands for all citizens, and to eliminate their responsibility to allow motorized recreational access for those citizens who desire it.
3. Land managers who are sympathetic to environmental interests using motorized and mechanized recreation as a convenient excuse to limit access to only those interested in, capable of, or willing to go in on foot. This, despite the fact that foot-borne trail proliferation and staging for hikers results in precisely the same sort of damage to otherwise pristine areas.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

OHV consequences

Rick 1188August 06, 2007 03:25PM

Re: OHV consequences

Rick 669August 06, 2007 03:27PM

Re: OHV consequences

LaughingBear 651August 06, 2007 05:04PM

Re: OHV consequences

Paul P. 690August 07, 2007 01:08PM

Re: OHV consequences

LaughingBear 644August 07, 2007 09:16PM

Re: OHV consequences

Big Ed 631August 13, 2007 10:33AM

Re: OHV consequences

jobe 778August 13, 2007 11:06AM

Re: OHV consequences

mojavegreen 687August 15, 2007 06:32PM

Re: OHV consequences

celtfire 1311August 16, 2007 09:15AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login