Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waning Crescent (3% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC34

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

January 12, 2007 11:17PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=FLO20070112&articleId=4433

Claiming the Prize: War Escalation Aimed at Securing Iraqi Oil

The reason that George W. Bush insists that "victory" is achievable in Iraq is not because he is deluded or isolated or ignorant or detached from reality or ill-advised.

No, it's that his definition of "victory" is different from those bruited about in his own rhetoric and in the ever-earnest disquisitions of the chattering classes in print and on-line. For Bush, victory is indeed at hand. It could come at any moment now, could already have been achieved by the time you read this. And the driving force behind his planned "surge" of American troops is the need to preserve those fruits of victory that are now ripening in his hand.

At any time within the next few days, the Iraqi Council of Ministers is expected to approve a new "hydrocarbon law" essentially drawn up by the Bush Administration and its U.K. lackey, the Independent on Sunday reports.

The new bill will "radically redraw the Iraqi oil industry and throw open the doors to the third-largest oil reserves in the world," say the paper, whose reporters have seen a draft of the new law. "It would allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil companies in the country since the industry was nationalized in 1972." If the government's parliamentary majority prevails, the law should take effect in March.

As the paper notes, the law will give Exxon, BP, Shell and other carbon cronies of the White House unprecedented sweetheart deals, allowing them to pump gargantuan profits from Iraq's nominally state-owned oilfields for decades to come.

This law has been in the works since the very beginning of the invasion -- indeed, since months before the invasion, when the Bush Administration brought in Phillip Carroll, former CEO of both Shell and Fluor, the politically-wired oil servicing firm, to devise "contingency plans" for divvying up Iraq's oil after the attack.

Once the deed was done, Carroll was made head of the American "advisory committee" overseeing the oil industry of the conquered land, as Joshua Holland of Alternet.org has chronicled in two remarkable reports on the backroom maneuvering over Iraq's oil: Bush's Petro-Cartel Almost Has Iraq's Oil and The U.S. Takeover of Iraqi Oil.

According to senior Bush minions talking up the plan for what is not a surge but a long-term escalation of urban warfare that the U.S. ground commander in Iraq says will likely last for years, Bush's new "stratergery" includes "benchmarks" that the natives must meet to keep in favor with their colonial master. One of the most prominent of these is the demand that Iraq "finalize a long-delayed measure on the distribution of oil revenue." As we can see by the Independent stories quoted here, that benchmark should be done and dusted within weeks.

From those earliest days until now, throughout all the twists and turns, the blood and chaos of the occupation, the Bush Administration has kept its eye on this prize. The new law offers the barrelling buccaneers of the West a juicy set of production-sharing agreements (PSAs) that will maintain a fig leaf of Iraqi ownership of the nation's oil industry -- while letting Bush's Big Oil buddies rake off up to 75 percent of all oil profits for an indefinite period up front, until they decide that their "infrastructure investments" have been repaid. Even then, the agreements will give the Western oil majors an unheard-of 20 percent of Iraq's oil profits -- more than twice the average of standard PSAs................
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC34

Wizard 1086January 08, 2007 10:49PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 699January 08, 2007 11:30PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 692January 08, 2007 11:51PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 664January 11, 2007 10:44PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 662January 11, 2007 11:41PM

Re: SC34

Rick 650January 12, 2007 07:13AM

Re: SC34

Paul P. 675January 12, 2007 06:25PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 620January 12, 2007 09:07PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 717January 12, 2007 10:37PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 605January 12, 2007 11:17PM

Re: SC34

Paul P. 636January 13, 2007 08:51AM

Re: SC34

Rick 647January 13, 2007 01:24PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 707January 13, 2007 10:58PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 759January 18, 2007 09:55PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 696January 18, 2007 10:17PM

Re: SC34

Paul P. 708January 19, 2007 05:02PM

Re: SC34

Rick 964January 19, 2007 06:30PM

2012?

mojavegreen 1147January 21, 2007 10:01AM

Global Warming Policy

Rick 806January 19, 2007 09:36PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 786January 19, 2007 10:00PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 681January 19, 2007 10:57PM

Re: SC34

Rick 775January 19, 2007 11:23PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 656January 19, 2007 11:54PM

Re: SC34

Wizard 683January 20, 2007 12:13AM

Re: SC34

Paul P. 646January 20, 2007 06:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login