Willa Zoe wrote:
>
> Even if Scott got an attorney pro bono and paid nothing for his
> defense, he still paid far too much.
>
> He was sentenced for violation of 36CFR Sec. 261.16 for
> operation of a vehicle and failure to buy an Adventure Pass.
> (As I understand from the posts here.) Apparently, the
> citation's issuing ranger, Scott and his attorney didn't bother
> to read the law on the matter.
Or perhaps the person typing the list here just made a mistake and hit a 6 rather than a 5?
The Moon is Waning Crescent (28% of Full)
Re: Scott Parker Is Innocent! Well, almost.
All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner
of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion
and not fact until verified independently.
| November 21, 2004 02:45PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
