Arizona Mike wrote:
> I do not condone anyone riding their dirt bikes through the
> area noted by Mojavegreen
Oh? Then why does the topic cause you so much grief?
> however when you own a large parcel
> of land as you do, live nowhere nearby, and seldom visit your
> property, you run the risk of trespassers and vandals. Makes
> sense doesn’t it?
Are you saying that somehow makes the law breaking ok?
> Furthermore, not one of your caretakers has the mobility to
> patrol the perimeter of your property.
Ok, the perimeter isn't patrolled so you don't have a problem with the criminal behavior of the trespassers.
> You and your caretakers
> do not have dirt bikes or atv’s in keeping trespass and /or
> vandalism to a minimum.
They aren't the police, Mike. They shouldn't be the ones enforcing the laws.
> What action have you taken to correct or reduce the problem of
> vandalism and trespass on your property? Answer, none that I
> know of.
You admission of ignorance is noted.
> Possible Solution:
> Maybe a great start, would be to sell out of Woodland Hills and
> move to the property you own where the problem is. Buy some
> dirt bikes / ATV’s and learn to ride them effectively. You can
> greatly increase you chances of catching those you feel are
> casing you grief. Hey!!! And you can enjoy some dirt bike /
> ATV riding while your on patrol !!!
Better solution:
Get the PTB to enforce the law instead of taking bribes and/or kick-backs from the dirt bike lobby.
> Possible Solution:
> Sell two-thirds to three-fourths of the property thereby
> greatly reducing the problem of trespass.
That'll happen right after you give up 3/4 of your wages to reduce the problem of your being robbed. Why should Dean give in to the off-road terrorists?
> What plans do have with 600 acres of desert property?
Why are his plans an issue, Mike? The property is Dean's and his plans are NOYFB.
> Why is it worth keeping
> that much land when you can’t manage it effectively?
Jealous? Afraid your Castro god will get arrest for trespassing?
> Kevin Ryan called me from New York and went over what he spoke
> to you about just a few days earlier. This all took place
> about year ago as I recall. I think he talks sense. Why are
> you having such a difficult time with what he said to you?
Perhaps you could enlighten us as to WTF you are talking about?
> Coming onto this DCHS Discussion Forum and complaining isn’t
> going resolve matters for you.
Obviously you very much dislike the issue being discussed. You've even sent threats to me via email to show what a big man you must be.
> We all too often read about
> problems with no one making suggestions or giving possible
> answers or solutions to the problems discussed.
Why do you have such a big problem with these issues being posted, Mike?
> The only person I can’t think of that has talked any sense here
> recently, was someone going by the name of Willa Zoe whom I
> totally agree with.
For all I know you might even be the Willa Zoe sock puppet. But I doubt you have the sophistication to pull that off.
Willa/mike/Jennifer tried to fool everyone by presenting opinions as "facts". Only the fools fell for it.