All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

September 30, 2004 08:52PM
jobe wrote:

> Probably for an insurance co. to give them a green or red
> light.

Insurance comapanies have little relevant to USFS policies, Joe. More likely there has been pressure from economic interests that has kept the forest from being closed as it was last year.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

Rick 965September 25, 2004 01:45PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

LaughingBear 610September 29, 2004 05:56PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

Rick 634September 29, 2004 06:18PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

Wizard 608September 29, 2004 07:58PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

Rick 984October 01, 2004 08:05PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

jobe 636September 29, 2004 08:00PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

Rick 566September 30, 2004 08:52PM

Re: Angeles National Forest Announces Increased Use Restrictions Effective - September 27

jobe 611September 30, 2004 09:13PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login