Arizona Mike wrote:
> There was an altercation and they were prodding Mike,
So Mike has a right to defend himself with a gun because some words were said? I don't think so.
> so don’t
> tell me that a property owner doesn’t have the right defend
> himself and his property.
The only reason Mike could legally threaten with a gun is if he thought his life was in immediate danger.
> It’s incidents like this one that’ll get the property close to
> all.
I'm all for the property closing to all. It'd definately improve the area.