Gary, you know I do consider your opinion, even though we may not always agree. Laughing Bear writes this " The only one who has to worry is you! CPS is watching you :-) ". There is no ambiguity in Laughing Bear's intent here, he meant it as a threat to me, my children, and my family. Then notice that he comes along in this thread, and the first thing he feels it is important to state, is that he is immune from prosecution, no matter what the moral implication of his actions, regarding a report he might make to the CPS, he declares first and foremost, " I am immune ". He proudly declares his immunity, so he can make it clear that this is something that will protect him, in reality, something he could hide behind. Sycamore, in my opinion, is steadfastly behind Laughing Bear's position. She implies that somehow I would be and unfit parent, if I associate, along with my children, with a person, that she disapproves of. These two people are running down the same path in regards to thier intentions, which is, to try and intimidate me, by thier veiled inuendos, into not visiting DCHS with my children. I will continue to visit these springs that are dear to my heart, with my family, and will pursue the objective of seeing that families are safe from the perverts, and the various people who would threaten thier special time there.
