Is Laughing Bear really Asking Honest Questions?

We welcome honest questions as we have presented evidence and documents about various incidents that did occur on the DCHS, Inc. website. Anyone asking honest questions and truly seeking the truth about these incidents is welcome as we can all learn from honest questions.

However, Laughing Bear pretends that he is just asking honest questions but he is not. All of his questions are slanted for the purpose of blaming the victim and/or harming Katrina's credibility, not to ascertain the truth.

However, this is secondary to the fact that Mike Castro and his associates have committed violent acts against the public. Laughing Bear's twisted questions are to divert your attention from this important concern about the safety of the public. That is why Laughing Bear's twisted questions are so harmful and why we are examining his motives. Laughing Bear tries to convince you, the forum reader that this about Katrina and William. It is not.

Are Laughing Bear's postings really "an honest questioning of the facts"?

Just in this Forum string, Laughing Bear has been twice exposed for asking deliberately twisted questions. Once again when he is caught, Laughing Bear responds by ranting about Katrina and William.

Lets look at how Laughing Bear asked a question about the victim in the El Mirage Incident.

>>Author: LaughingBear; Date: 07-12-03 17:37
>>" Why didn't this victim report this as you claim it happened?
>>If I were assaulted by a gang of thugs, I would not hesitate to
>>report it as it happened.

Just like Laughing Bear tried to blame the Widow Bates, Laughing Bear is now trying to blame the victim of the El Mirage Incident for not reporting the crime to police. In the victim's six-page statement that was displayed on the DCHS website, the victim said that he tried to get law enforcement to investigate and change their records to indicate the attempted murder. The victim was classified as a "John Doe" because he had no identification, which is an indication that he had no wallet. He had no wallet because he had been robbed.

Laughing Bear himself knows that people who have been the victims of violence to the point where they end up at the ICU may have a hard time remembering what exactly happened to them. Yet, Laughing Bear then criticizes one of these victims. I think Laughing Bear's bedside manner is greatly lacking.

Laughing Bear's been caught manipulating forum opinion again.

That's right, Laughing Bear appears on this forum as the energetic defender of the Toll Trolls past and present. Laughing Bear casts blame upon the victims of the Toll Troll's violence and castigates William and Katrina for bringing these issues to light for all to see. Laughing Bear claims that he is an ICU registered nurse, that he has treated many victims of crime; so why would he defend the perpetrators of violence, blame the victims and attack people attempting to bring an end to the violence?