Blue Corn, I don't know where you get that I, in your words " take great pride in being nuetral ". In every case when I have posted here as Wizard, Oz, Mojo and the rest, I have expressed my view as I saw it. I have never stated anywhere that my mission is to remain nuetral. You saying this makes me think you haven't been observing this forum for that long. So is that your goal in life, remain nuetral on all issues. So when Hitler was taking over Europe, you think it would have been best for all the people affected by him to say, " I've got no problem with Hitler, I'm nuetral ". Now in the post above Kevin has said some things that I don't agree with and I don't feel bad in anyway expressing what I feel about what he has written. In reference to rational thinking, ideas that show reason in how they were derived, everyone has thier take on what is reasonable and what is not, its not fixed, not set in stone. You want to address something specifically about what I posted, then state your case. So Blue Corn, anything to say about Kevins post which references me in a derogatory manner ? If those things were said about you, what would you do, remain nuetral ? Opinions are what makes the world go round, nuetrality is for swizterland and diplomats :-) Above in one of your post you express that if someone dislikes another person that its because they see something in that person they don't like about themselves. So if someone shoots my children in front of me and I don't like them, then what, my dislike of them is really about some failings in my self that I really see in the person who has shoot my children ? Is that rational to you Blue Corn ? We definitly come from a differant base in accessing the reasoning behind what makes sense in this world. I will continue to do it in my way and you will in yours.
