Re: The Murder of Ronnie Bates

Katrina's postings here under the heading"the murder of Ronnie Bates" are an example of what I am talking about. How does she know that Mr Bates was murdered? The is no evidence that supports this theory however,this does not stop her from trying to frame Mike Castro. Shame shame shame on you Karrina. What about all of that talk about being a civil rights activist? What about Mr Castro's civil rights? More waffles for breakfast today?

Here we go with the old double standard again. In my opinion,her arguements have more flip flops than the shoe pavilion. Fortunatly,the law does protect people from witch hunts like this. When "Widow Bates"described the look in her husbands eyes the last time she saw him,she was describing the disease of addiction. He was going to go do what he was going to do no matter what.

There is a saying that "if you play on the tracks long enough,the train will hit you" Evidently,the train came for Ronnie Bates sometime around Jan 19,1997. The driver of the train appears to be drugs. Wheather Ronnie died from natural causes or foul play has not been determined. Perhaps she should spend more time trying to find some forensic evidence to support her theory of murder before pointing fingers at people. The factor of drug abuse is something to consider. I do have an open mind regarding this case and foul play is a possibility,however accusing someone without an eyewitness or physical proof is totaly wrong.