I talked with Brad this morning and he said that he had read the second pass draft that was posted by Ron on the forum. He said that he thought that the draft looked real good. He suggested that in the one section where it mentions that DCHS has historically been accepted as a clothing optional area, that the next sentence which says that there are no laws against nudity in National Forest lands is incorrect. He said that there were laws that could apply but that it has been the Forest Service " accepted practice " that nudity would be tolerated in thier lands. So basically what he is looking for is that the flier does not indicate that there are no laws against nudity in these USFS lands and that when we describe the USFS policy concerning nudity that we use the words " accepted practice ". Hopefully I have stated Brad's position correctly. He would like to be faxed a copy when we have it ready, he may have more suggestions to make on it. He gave me his fax number and I'll give it to Ron when he is ready to send off a draft to Brad. He also said it would be a good Idea to mention the fact that other agencies policies could also apply to these Forest Service areas. Something along the lines of what I suggested in my previous post about nudity and policies in this thread. Also Brad made the point to mention to me that they ( USFS ) will be more active in enforcing the rules for the Deep Creek areas as seen on thier handout. At present the fine for violations like the day use rule is 50 dollars but Brad said there are plans in the works that will at some point increase this fine by as much as four fold, he said its just a matter of time so he indicated that we may want to mention something about thier ( USFS ) activity levels and something about the fines. I'm not exactly sure what way he would want that worded so maybe we could submit the draft and ask him to put in what he feels would be appropriate concerning this subject.