Paul, If someone suggests that something is slanderous it seems to me that they should be clear that this is truly the case to be honest in thier accusation. If Mike Castro thinks he has been slandered and he has specific proof of this, then it seems to me he could successfully sue Katrina, but he hasn't. I really don't think you Paul or you MP have the specific proof that would show that what Katrina has outlined as incidents is false. I think my point is very clear. Mike Castro does not have to prove that he is innocent of these accusations, on the other hand I think it is inherently wrong to call Katrina,s information slanderous without providing specific proof that this is actually the case. Now MP, I have known Mike Digioia for many years. I suspect you may not know him or have only dealt with him very little. I have little doubt that Kat's Nightmare is AZ. Mike Digioia posted here as Guess when he first started interacting with this forum. I noticed that it was Digioia by the way Guess phrased things. You mention that a person cannot change the numbers of thier IP address. In the above various post by Kat I see that in the first one above he has the numbers .245.77.12 and in the one above that it is .156.153.196. and in the one above that it is .156.146.195. and in the one above that its .208.241.31. It changes again and again. When Mike Digioia has posted the IP is the same except for the numbers. I have not seen anyone else post here with that IP, disregarding the numbers. Lets see who Kat really is first before we assume I am wrong in my conjecture. I just wanted to make all of you aware that you may very well be listening to Mike Digioia again trying to act like he is someone new with these ideas he expresses about Katrina. MP you state " let go and let God ". In saying this I must assume that you have a specific notion of what God is, for you. Also in this statement you assume that I except that the notion that a God is something that exist, is valid, and real. In my case, I draw my conclusions on how I choose to interact with the things in my life, by, my life experience, only. So it seems to me that we come from very differant sources when we intellectually examine and decide for ourselves how we should conduct ourselves in our lives. That does not mean however, that in many cases we might still draw the same conclusions about things. You also speak of forgivness. That is an ideal that runs strong in many religons. I am not one to hold a grudge of any magnitude since life goes quickly and is done in a blink of the eye, so to speak, in the end. So as not to get to complictated I will stick to this idea of forgivness in regards to Mike Digioia. He has shown me disrespect by his manner many times now in the years I have known him. I have let it go many times and now I " choose " not to let it go. Sometimes people can change and make amends in a responsible manner, if not, they need to be held accoutable for thier actions. That is what I feel must happen concerning my relationship with Mike Digioia. Forgivness is not the issue, it is accountability. I will not continuously turn the other cheek when I find that a person I am dealing with has no will to show respect. I do not post on this forum to win any popularity contest. I suggest ideas that may bring a clearer understanding of the subjects that are discussed, that is my goal. I respect that you or any of the other posters may hold a differant veiw. I except that as being only natural. I will, as I have throughout my life, express my veiw of things, in the most accurate way I can, and I will always consider others observations of my thoughts. There is always someone out there that can teach you new things, no matter who you are. Thanks for your comment Paul and MP :-)
