I've noticed a couple comments in this thread about slander regarding the information Katrina has posted. I watched a program last night about solving crimes. In this particular program a man had been suspected by law enforcement officials for many years of the possibility of doing a whole host of murders, as well as other crimes. This man to his family, and to all of his friends appeared to be a regular, nice, upstanding sort of guy. All these people in close proximity to this individual had no idea of the thoughts and actions that made this man, also, a monster! In the end, this guy was found out to have murdered many woman and had a record as long as your arm. He was a genius at conning people into believing what they wanted him to believe. He conned the women in various ways to get thier trust, and then murdered them. This went on for many, many years and no one could put the proof together. In the end they finally caught up with this maniac through unexpected and accidental circumstances, otherwise this individual would probably still be out there doing his evil deeds. Just goes to show ya, you really don't know who you can trust these days. We " all " need to be careful around people we " really " don't know. Is what Katrina proposes as acts by Mike Castro slanderous, or does it represent actual events that have taken place, this is a critical distinction. Could any of you actually disprove what Katina proposes. I couldn't. I also must say in all fairness that I couldn't prove it either. Just something to remember, " Things are many times, not what the seem to be ". Its important to realize what things you can " really " know. The rest is conjecture.