FOF, thanks for reply and I appreciate your input. I inserted the word "fail" too many times, I agree, thanks. Furthermore I mistakingly left out a word in the last part of my question to Katrina. It should have been: "then when will you stop this crusade?" (7 words not 6), Sorry!
I guess it boils down to what each of us believe what the word "Logical" means in reference to what Katrina, (Gail Fry) and William Scwiess are continuing to do. You see the logic in it and I do not.
Speaking for myself, there is nothing beneficial about her crusade.
Mike, Tanya and Kevin will not just,..... disappear. So I see no reason for Katrina to continue with this nonsense. I believe she should drop what she's doing and go away.
FOF, you sound like you're a reasonable and knowledgeable person when it comes to the adventure pass and number of other U.S. Forest matters / issues, but I feel you and few others are terribly misled to what Katrina and William are attempting to do.
I personally know both sides of the so-call feud, but have difficulty why some of you are still holding to Katrina's side or maybe pretending to be.
If Katrina says one thing of slander towards an individual, would it not be fair to, at least investigate it and hear the opposing side by those directly involved, such as Mike C. is this case?
The Moon is Waning Crescent (4% of Full)
Re: Question for Mary
All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner
of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion
and not fact until verified independently.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
