Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waning Gibbous (98% of Full)


Advanced

Re: Shot in the hills

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

June 26, 2002 08:28AM
I cannot believe what I just read!

From FOF: "How is it that Mike C. 'screens" people going to the springs and what is his reasoning in doing so?"

Duh! He does it when they drive up to his front door! If he detects something askew, he turns them away. What's so hard to understand? If the group looks like a bunch of roudys who may be more trouble than they're worth, he turns them away, the same way as YOU would if a bunch of idiots showed up at YOUR door. Do you know what an 'idiot' is? It's a person or persons who can't seem to behave themselves in public. We know they exist. Why are you pretending they don't?

Also from FOF: "The springs are on public land and everyone has the right to access them."

NO ONE has the right to cross private property without permission. Including YOU. Get it right, FOF. And whatever criteria Mike applies to 'screen' people is entirely up to him. If he thought you were ugly, for example, he COULD turn you away merely on that basis if it suited him. It's HIS property. Do you understand the concept of PRIVATE PROPERTY? Apparently not.

Another thing from FOF: "If he chooses to 'help' stranded, lost or injuried people then good for him but we do not have to thank him...".

Right. You can minimize his efforts. You can be continue to be ungrateful for his efforts. I'll bet that if you ever did break down somewhere near Mike's place, you'd walk home to avoid having to thank Mike for helping. That sure sounds reasonable and mature.

WIZARD:
I don't understand you. You have the opportunity to set the record straight regarding your alleged involvement in making a new trail, but apparently would rather play games. Do you really expect that readers here would take the time to 'research' past posts to find the answer? Your response points to an agenda other than stating the facts. That may not be accurate, but that's the perception you've left with me and perhaps others.

Someone else asks why Mike is "expected" to help people in the first place. Well, obviously he doesn't have to help anyone. But he does. He just happens to be the only one in the area familiar with the area enough to be of help. And he just happens to be the only one who's available to help.

Who are stranded people going to call for help? Obviously, they're going to call Mike. Not Gail. Not FOF. Not Wizard. Not Jobe. Not DCR. Why? Cuz you guys are not there on a consistant basis like Mike is. Mike is EXPECTED to help because he has proved to be the only one who DOES help on a consistant basis.

Mike provides a valuable service but apparently gets nothing but criticism for doing so. And I think I know why.

Wizard and others, it is my impression that each of you have had some run-in with Mike at one time or another and THAT is the reason you have a problem with Mike. When you're wrong, like when you're caught trespassing on private property, you eat the crow that you put on your own plate - you don't blame and defame the guy who caught you.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

Shot in the hills

Wizard 1231June 20, 2002 08:55PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 720June 20, 2002 09:00PM

Re: Shot in the hills

mp 685June 21, 2002 12:23AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 754June 20, 2002 09:46PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 762June 21, 2002 09:39AM

Re: Shot in the hills

mp 823June 22, 2002 08:30PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 827June 23, 2002 06:42AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Arizona Mike 724June 24, 2002 07:34PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 692June 25, 2002 12:31PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 696June 25, 2002 04:11PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 694June 24, 2002 11:25PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Arizona Mike 787June 25, 2002 11:50AM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 718June 25, 2002 07:44AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Arizona Mike 746June 25, 2002 11:54AM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 745June 25, 2002 12:00PM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 725June 25, 2002 12:54PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 1406June 25, 2002 01:20PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 905June 25, 2002 01:34PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Free our Forests 1372June 25, 2002 01:52PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 762June 25, 2002 02:39PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Free our Forests 747June 25, 2002 04:30PM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 779June 25, 2002 06:36PM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 782June 25, 2002 07:07PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 753June 25, 2002 08:44PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 742June 25, 2002 08:58PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 747June 25, 2002 09:27PM

Re: Shot in the hills

laughing bear 705June 26, 2002 08:13AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 744June 26, 2002 11:43AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 822June 26, 2002 08:28AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 672June 26, 2002 08:50AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 675June 26, 2002 08:53AM

Re: Shot in the hills

EastBay 728June 26, 2002 10:50AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 650June 26, 2002 12:18PM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 642June 26, 2002 11:25AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 884June 26, 2002 11:28AM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 675June 26, 2002 11:59AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 779June 26, 2002 12:28PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Naked Man 732June 26, 2002 01:49PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 645June 26, 2002 12:09PM

Re: Shot in the hills

DCR 730June 26, 2002 12:40PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Free our Forests 742June 26, 2002 02:09PM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 746June 26, 2002 07:02PM

Re: Shot in the hills

EastBay 807June 27, 2002 11:23AM

Re: Shot in the hills

Wizard 1150June 27, 2002 08:03PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login