Re: The beach enforcer is doing the right thing IMO

Well all I know is, that is not the type of site I would "jerk off" too. I thought you might be onto something with the captions because I hadn't noticed them when I first clicked on it. I must be going to the wrong site because I do not find words like beauty, cliff jumper, fun in the sun, lower pools, or panorama disrespectful. The only ONE, not some, that I figure you could be referring to is boobies but if you find that disrespectful I think your nuts and my four and five year old daughters would really offend you because they are under the impression that that is what they are called as well. I am not trying to be disrespect your opinion I just think labeling that as a "jerk off site" is a much more extreme and vile statement than anything that webpage contains.
None the less, back to the original point of Paul P, I agree with him completely. My 2 cents, sense we are dropping them in the bucket is, if you come up aggressively ordering me what I can and can't do with my personal phone on a public beach or any public place you better have a badge and gun or you will regret it. I have not and never would take someone's picture, clothed or not, without asking first simply because I believe it is a common courtesy. That being said if you are that freaked out and paranoid by the idea of somebody taking your picture then do not be nude in a public place, simple as that. I think it is very wrong to take pictures of someone without their permission, as I already said, but I am willing to assume the risk that by some random twist of fate some pervert might be hiding taking pictures of me. If I was paranoid about it I would close my blinds and walk around my house naked, not out in the open in a public place. As far as them getting on the internet and causing some kind of embarrassment with family or work. I see this point two ways. One, I am not ashamed to be a naturist, don't hide it from anyone I know, and I have never met a true naturist that feels any different. Two, if it is being used on an actual pornography or homosexual site, and your family or employer find it, then in my opinion they are the ones that have some explaining to do. What were they doing on that website in the first place. Again I am not trying to disrespect anyone's opinion I simply do not agree and am trying to provide a different prospective to consider. Either way my observation in this exact instance is, Paul P was the only person there having his personal rights aggressively attacked as he was clearly doing nothing wrong let alone illegal.
Just my 2 cents, take em or leave em, I mean no harm.