Last post on this, seriously: Wizard, you are looking at the definition of "related" for things, not persons. Webster's New World Dictionary: "related, applied to persons, implies close connection through sanguinity or, less often, through marriage (i.e., we are related through our mothers; applied to things, close connection through common origin, interdependence, etc."
You know or should know that when I informed you, in a public post, that sungirl is a female person unrelated to me I was (a) telling you I knew her (how else would I know she was a "female person"?) and (a) that she was not my relative, wife, etc.
There was no deception about any of that whatsoever. And Sungirl offered in a PM to Rick several weeks ago to call him on the telephone to verify all of this (not that she or I were required to). Rick did not accept her offer to speak on the phone with him.
So do you still think she is me? How about outlawHEART? You and others were wrong to state or even think either of those two things. Those who did were simply seeking an irrelevant way to attack the person expressing a viewpoint rather than the viewpoint itself. It's crude, but common.
To all readers: I will not be further responding to this insanity. What zaniness and hostility for a hot springs forum!