Well I can understand Sam why you thought from the description given by Dudenate that he was perhaps referencing Carson. And Sam this you wrote " one of few folks who takes care of the springs " is in accordance with my experience with Carson also.
It is clear from Dudenate's own comments here that he has some lengthy experience around Carson as per his comment " 3 years now ". Obviously then he knows well what Carson looks like. I know now that Carson was there the day of this purported " incident ". There is no doubt that Dudenate gave his description to imply that Carson was involved with nefarious activity, teaming up with the " snake guy " to sneak around taking improper pictures of unsuspecting women.
But look how Dudenate responds when Carson's name is offered up, he just cites the people suggesting the name that fits his decription ( which its clear now its who he meant ) as being gay, which for one thing shows us that Dudenate is a Homophobe. But the thing to note is that Dudenate did not indicate ( which he could have easily done ) that the name that was offered up was wrong which is telling. Dudenate knows Carson, he clearly was in close proximity to the " supposed " skinney offender in the cream colored cowboy hat and yet given the opportunity does not say " no I'm not talking about Carson " or something like that to indicate Sam was wrong in his assumption of who it was.
Another thing to consider is that in Dudenate's initial accusation with description of the man with the hat he does not give Carson's name, when its now clear to me that he has seen Carson many times, and its clearly who he was talking about. If Dudenate was truly a responsible person so concerned about the saftey of other visitors, and he truly thought Carson was involved with the improper behavior he described then why would he have not offered up the added important indentifying detail of the unusual name of Carson to help people " watch out for " the supposed person behaving improperly that he implies he suspects.
Dudenate refers to Carson as a " duche bag " which I'm sure the female vistiors to this forum will appreciate him using as a description. Clearly Dudenate does not like Carson. As far as textile visitors to DCHS are concerned, I along with Carson ( similiar to the sentiments of other Naturist ) are dismayed to see a strong trend in recent years to more textile visitation to these springs, and less Naturist folks. Naturally those interested in the clothing optional experience enjoy the presence of other Naturist. It can definitely be uncomfortable for some Naturist people to be at DCHS when they are pretty much the only nude person, or one of only a few when the place is full of textile users.
So the question remains, why did Dudenate not give Carson's name? I think Dudenate did this because it would allow him to deny at some later point that he actually meant Carson in the event some ill came to Carson because of these accusations Dudenate has made. I think because Dudenate does not like Carson for his own reasons unrelated to any of his suggested accusations that his purpose in this was to shine an unjustified ill light on Carson, which might cause Carson to suffer some grief from others for something Carson was not actually involved with.
So I think Dudenate in Carson's case has made what are in truth false accusations only for the purpose of causing problems for him, not because Carson had anything to do with taking improper photos of women at DCHS. I don't recall having met Dudenate but I'm told that he ( with a number of tattos apparently ) is loud, obtrusive, unduly injects himself into other peoples space and business down there at DCHS, and he generally behaves as if he owns the place.
Edited 9 time(s). Last edit at 09/29/2010 09:14PM by Wizard.