Because the public (you and I) use a road, it does NOT make it a "public road" as you seem to imply.
Bowen Ranch roads are PRIVATE roads on PRIVATE property, and the owner can charge a fee (not a "toll" and restrict use of that road at their SOLE discretion.
Any argument or assertion to the contrary is completely misled and inaccurate.
To further clarify these issues for those who still haven't made sense of it all, access and ownership as it relates to DCHS, Inc's claims is as follows:
1) That DCHS, Inc claims it has a right to use a road to access the Springs, based on an [illegal] use of a former easement referred to as Moss Mill Road. That DCHS, Inc thinks it can continue to use that road, despite the FACT that it's on PRIVATE property and never had permission or any legal right to use that road in the first place.
2) That DCHS, Inc presumes ownership of Bowen Ranch buildings based on a QUITCLAIM deed obtained from FORMER owners of the land the buildings are on, but AFTER the ownership of the buildings had already been resolved when new parties purchased BOTH of the parcels of land involved.
3) That furthermore, DCHS, Inc NEVER had ANY [legal] interest in the lands or buildings involved. That DCHS, Inc paid $1500 for a QUITCLAIM deed to people who had no legal right to sell it in the first place [that is worth about as much as the paper it's printed on].