Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waning Gibbous (97% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC88

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

March 22, 2009 02:56PM
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover/7

The Big Takeover

The global economic crisis isn't about money - it's about power. How Wall Street insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution

...........None other than disgraced senator Ted Stevens was the poor sap who made the unpleasant discovery that if Congress didn't like the Fed handing trillions of dollars to banks without any oversight, Congress could apparently go **** itself — or so said the law. When Stevens asked the GAO about what authority Congress has to monitor the Fed, he got back a letter citing an obscure statute that nobody had ever heard of before: the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950. The relevant section, 31 USC 714(b), dictated that congressional audits of the Federal Reserve may not include "deliberations, decisions and actions on monetary policy matters." The exemption, as Foss notes, "basically includes everything." According to the law, in other words, the Fed simply cannot be audited by Congress. Or by anyone else, for that matter.

VI. WINNERS AND LOSERS

Stevens isn't the only person in Congress to be given the finger by the Fed. In January, when Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida asked Federal Reserve vice chairman Donald Kohn where all the money went — only $1.2 trillion had vanished by then — Kohn gave Grayson a classic eye roll, saying he would be "very hesitant" to name names because it might discourage banks from taking the money.

"Has that ever happened?" Grayson asked. "Have people ever said, 'We will not take your $100 billion because people will find out about it?'"

"Well, we said we would not publish the names of the borrowers, so we have no test of that," Kohn answered, visibly annoyed with Grayson's meddling.

Grayson pressed on, demanding to know on what terms the Fed was lending the money. Presumably it was buying assets and making loans, but no one knew how it was pricing those assets — in other words, no one knew what kind of deal it was striking on behalf of taxpayers. So when Grayson asked if the purchased assets were "marked to market" — a methodology that assigns a concrete value to assets, based on the market rate on the day they are traded — Kohn answered, mysteriously, "The ones that have market values are marked to market." The implication was that the Fed was purchasing derivatives like credit swaps or other instruments that were basically impossible to value objectively — paying real money for God knows what.

"Well, how much of them don't have market values?" asked Grayson. "How much of them are worthless?"

"None are worthless," Kohn snapped.

"Then why don't you mark them to market?" Grayson demanded.

"Well," Kohn sighed, "we are marking the ones to market that have market values."

In essence, the Fed was telling Congress to lay off and let the experts handle things. "It's like buying a car in a used-car lot without opening the hood, and saying, 'I think it's fine,'" says Dan Fuss, an analyst with the investment firm Loomis Sayles. "The salesman says, 'Don't worry about it. Trust me.' It'll probably get us out of the lot, but how much farther? None of us knows."

When one considers the comparatively extensive system of congressional checks and balances that goes into the spending of every dollar in the budget via the normal appropriations process, what's happening in the Fed amounts to something truly revolutionary — a kind of shadow government with a budget many times the size of the normal federal outlay, administered dictatorially by one man, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke. "We spend hours and hours and hours arguing over $10 million amendments on the floor of the Senate, but there has been no discussion about who has been receiving this $3 trillion," says Sen. Bernie Sanders. "It is beyond comprehension."............

The rest of this article is excellent and goes into the subjects of CDO's, CDS,s, the FED relationship to AIG and more details of the history of how the implosion of the newly created financial instruments brought the US economic house of cards down. Reading the complete article will be well worth your time.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC88

Wizard 1363March 15, 2009 03:37PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 792March 15, 2009 04:22PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 760March 15, 2009 04:51PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 667March 18, 2009 04:27PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 768March 18, 2009 09:59PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 889March 19, 2009 09:18PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 673March 20, 2009 08:12PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 1370March 20, 2009 08:48PM

Re: SC88

Rick 727March 20, 2009 09:40PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 806March 21, 2009 10:15AM

Re: SC88

Wizard 761March 21, 2009 10:54AM

Re: SC88

Wizard 796March 22, 2009 10:30AM

Re: SC88

Wizard 662March 22, 2009 11:18AM

Re: SC88

Wizard 739March 22, 2009 02:56PM

Re: SC88

Wizard 1530March 22, 2009 09:47PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login