I feel like I am getting a clearer, less convoluted picture of the motivations behind DCHS INC. It is always good to know what would be gained by an individual or group of people by their pushing a certain argument or viewpoint. Particularly when it is against one person. And particularly when there is alot of emotion behind it. Emotions cloud the mind when making judgements of what is lawful or unlawful, right or wrong, his or mine, bad versus good, mean, versus nice. Who can trust that person. Where is the credibility. Credibility is everything in discusions involving laws, eye witnesses, courts, public lands, regulation and fines. It all stems back to this one question one should ask oneself: "What does this person have to gain by making me believe and feel that what they are saying is true." Especially, and I mean especially ask yourself this when they are emotional and are trying to play on your emotions. Credibility is everything.
