All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

July 30, 2008 05:35PM
Rick,
Retrofitting is for weak buildings. If the building is built strong to begin with no need to make it stronger. California building codes do not allow hospitals to be built with the need for retro fitting.
That is like telling Arnold, your Governor that he should do 600 push ups instead of his regular 500 push ups. He will not get any stronger with the extra hundred push ups. He would only build up his endurance not his strength. His strength is maxed out. These hospitals structrual strength are all ready at their maximum when they are built.
After the Whittier earthquake I heard there was an up grading to the code and some of the older hospitals back then were retro fitted. So, there is no need to retro fit any already retro fitted hospitals.
Get it ?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

Shake, rattle and roll!

Rick 1409July 29, 2008 01:11PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 799July 29, 2008 03:32PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 753July 29, 2008 03:45PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

Rick 774July 29, 2008 05:03PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 696July 29, 2008 06:05PM

In search of book “Bowen escapades” written by Gertie Bowen in 1964

Rattlesnake ranch188November 12, 2023 01:01AM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

LaughingBear 782July 30, 2008 09:52AM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

Rick 799July 30, 2008 01:02PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 773July 30, 2008 02:30PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

Rick 732July 30, 2008 04:08PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 963July 30, 2008 05:35PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

Rick 744July 30, 2008 08:55PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

jobe 760July 30, 2008 10:34PM

Re: Shake, rattle and roll!

Paul P. 1371July 31, 2008 10:39AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login