Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Full


Advanced

Re: SC49

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

September 10, 2007 12:16PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060909&articleId=3194

Where was Osama on September 11, 2001?

............Why does the US administration state that they cannot find Osama?

If they are to stand by their report ( Dan Rather CBS news report, 1-28-2002 ), the conclusion is obvious. The administration is lying. Osama bin Laden's whereabouts were known.

If the CBS report is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the Pakistani military hospital on September 10, courtesy of America's ally, he was either still in hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when the attacks occurred or had been released from the hospital within the last hours before the attacks.

In other words, Osama's whereabouts were known to US officials on the morning of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated negotiations with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden. These negotiations, led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, head of Pakistan's military intelligence, on behalf of the government of President Pervez Musharraf, took place on the 12th and 13th of September in Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage's office.

He could have been arrested at short notice on September 10th, 2001. But then we would not have been privileged to five years of Osama related media stories. The Bush administration desperately needs the fiction of an "outside enemy of America".

Known and documented Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda is a construct of the US intelligence apparatus. His essential function is to give a face to the "war on terrorism". The image must be vivid.

According to the White house, "The greatest threat to us is this ideology of violent extremism, and its greatest public proponent is Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden remains the number one target, in terms of our efforts, but he's not the only target." Recent Statement of White House Assistant for Homeland Security Frances Townsend, 5 September 2006).

The national security doctrine rests on the fiction of Islamic terrorists, led by Osama who are portrayed as a "threat to the civilized World". In the words of President Bush, "Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. The question is will we listen? Will we pay attention to what these evil men say? We are on the offensive. We will not rest. We will not retreat. And we will not withdraw from the fight until this threat to civilization has been removed." (quoted by CNN, September 5, 2006)

The "hot pursuit" of Osama in the rugged mountainous areas of Pakistan must continue, because without Osama, referred to ad nauseam in news reports and official statements, the fragile legitimacy of the Bush administration collapses like a deck of cards.

Moreover, the search for Osama protects the real architects of the 911 attacks. While there is no evidence that Al Qaeda was behind the 911 attacks, as revealed by nuerous studies and documents, there is mounting evidence of complicity and coverup at the highest levels of the US State, Military and intelligence apparatus.

The continued arrest of alleged 911 accomplices and suspects has nothing to do with "national security". It creates the illusion that Arabs and Muslims are behind the terror plots, while shunting the conduct of a real criminal investigation into the 911 attacks. And what were dealing with is the criminalization of the upper echelons of State.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC49

Wizard 1280August 15, 2007 02:39PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 709August 15, 2007 10:56PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 644August 20, 2007 10:15PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 668September 09, 2007 01:19AM

Re: SC49

Wizard 664September 09, 2007 01:28AM

Re: SC49

Paul P. 615September 09, 2007 08:31AM

Re: SC49

Wizard 625September 09, 2007 01:25PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 649September 10, 2007 10:00AM

Re: SC49

Wizard 616September 10, 2007 11:54AM

Re: SC49

Wizard 630September 10, 2007 12:16PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 629September 10, 2007 12:48PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 756September 11, 2007 09:59PM

Re: SC49

Wizard 1151September 12, 2007 09:36AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login