Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (86% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC46

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

July 18, 2007 11:51PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6344

The Coming Conflict in the Arctic
Russia and US to Square Off Over Arctic Energy Reserves

...........the stage has been quietly set for a much more serious confrontation in the non-too-distant future between Russia and the United States – along with Canada, Norway and Denmark.

Russia has recently laid claim to a vast 1,191,000 sq km (460,800 sq miles) chunk of the ice-covered Arctic seabed. The claim is not really about territory, but rather about the huge hydrocarbon reserves that are hidden on the seabed under the Arctic ice cap. These newly discovered energy reserves will play a crucial role in the global energy balance as the existing reserves of oil and gas are depleted over the next 20 years.

Russia has the world's largest gas reserves and is the second largest exporter of oil after Saudi Arabia, but its oil and gas production is slated to decline after 2010 as currently operational reserves dwindle. Russia’s Natural Resources Ministry estimates that the country’s existing oil reserves will be depleted by 2030.

The 2005 BP World Energy Survey projects that U.S. oil reserves will last another 10 years if the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not opened for oil exploration, Norway’s reserves are good for about seven years and British North Sea reserves will last no more than five years – which is why the Arctic reserves, which are still largely unexplored, will be of such crucial importance to the world’s energy future. Scientists estimate that the territory contains more than 10 billion tons of gas and oil deposits. The shelf is about 200 meters (650 feet) deep and the challenges of extracting oil and gas there appear to be surmountable, particularly if the oil prices stay where they are now – over $70 a barrel.

The Kremlin wants to secure Russia's long-term dominance over global energy markets. To ensure this, Russia needs to find new sources of fuel and the Arctic seems like the only place left to go. But there is a problem: International law does not recognize Russia’s right to the entire Arctic seabed north of the Russian coastline.

The 1982 International Convention on the Law of the Sea establishes a 12 mile zone for territorial waters and a larger 200 mile economic zone in which a country has exclusive drilling rights for hydrocarbon and other resources.

Russia claims that the entire swath of Arctic seabed in the triangle that ends at the North Pole belongs to Russia, but the United Nations Committee that administers the Law of the Sea Convention has so far refused to recognize Russia’s claim to the entire Arctic seabed.

In order to legally claim that Russia’s economic zone in the Arctic extends far beyond the 200 mile zone, it is necessary to present viable scientific evidence showing that the Arctic Ocean’s sea shelf to the north of Russian shores is a continuation of the Siberian continental platform. In 2001, Russia submitted documents to the UN commission on the limits of the continental shelf seeking to push Russia's maritime borders beyond the 200 mile zone. It was rejected.

Now Russian scientists assert there is new evidence that Russia’s northern Arctic region is directly linked to the North Pole via an underwater shelf. Last week a group of Russian geologists returned from a six-week voyage to the Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater shelf in Russia's remote eastern Arctic Ocean. They claimed the ridge was linked to Russian Federation territory, boosting Russia's claim over the oil- and gas-rich triangle........

...........The United States has been jealous of Russia’s attempts to project its dominance in the energy sector and has sought to limit opportunities for Russia to control export routes and energy deposits outside Russia’s territory. But the Arctic shelf is something that Russia has traditionally regarded as its own. For decades, international powers have pressed no claims to Russia’s Arctic sector for obvious reasons of remoteness and inhospitability, but no longer.

Now, as the world’s major economic powers brace for the battle for the last barrel of oil, it is not surprising that the United States would seek to intrude on Russia’s home turf. It is obvious that Moscow would try to resist this U.S. intrusion and would view any U.S. efforts to block Russia’s claim to its Arctic sector as unfriendly and overtly provocative. Furthermore, such a policy would actually help the Kremlin justify its hardline position. It would certainly prove right Moscow’s assertion that U.S. policy towards Russia is really driven by the desire to get guaranteed and privileged access to Russia’s energy resources............
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC46

Wizard 1064July 18, 2007 09:45PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 768July 18, 2007 10:43PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 754July 18, 2007 11:14PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 706July 18, 2007 11:51PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 651July 19, 2007 09:23PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 619July 19, 2007 11:03PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 667July 19, 2007 11:28PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 738July 20, 2007 05:14PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 757July 21, 2007 06:12PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 596July 22, 2007 10:35PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 634July 23, 2007 10:34PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 712July 23, 2007 10:58PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 672July 23, 2007 11:37PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 603July 24, 2007 12:48PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 823July 24, 2007 10:26PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 662July 26, 2007 04:41PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 886July 28, 2007 04:48PM

Re: SC46

LaughingBear 635July 28, 2007 05:12PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 720July 28, 2007 05:53PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 693July 28, 2007 06:58PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 755July 28, 2007 07:37PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 783July 29, 2007 07:09PM

Re: SC46

Wizard 1202July 30, 2007 10:33PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login