Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Crescent (10% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC41

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

May 01, 2007 07:41PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WAT20070430&articleId=5530

John Kerry: Building 7 Was Deliberately Demolished

Massachusetts Senator's conclusion directly contradicts 9/11 official story, multi-billion dollar insurance lawsuit

At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas, Senator John Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building 7 by concluding that according to his information, the building was brought down as a result of a controlled demolition, directly contradicting the official line that the structure fell as a result of fire and debris damage.

WTC Building 7 was a 47-story building in the WTC complex that collapsed at 5:20pm on September 11. The building had been structurally reinforced and was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in a uniform implosion within its own footprint in a matter of seconds after sustaining relatively light debris and fire damage following the collapse of the twin towers.

News networks like BBC and CNN were reporting that the building had collapsed before it fell, indicating that the media were being handed a script of events that had yet to even unfold.

Ground zero EMT's, firefighters and police were all told hours in advance to clear a collapse zone for Building 7 as it was going to be "brought down."

Questioned on WTC 7 by members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now at a Book People event in Austin Texas, Kerry responded, "I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things, that they did it in a controlled fashion."

Kerry is basically saying that the building was intentionally demolished to prevent a random collapse from damaging nearby buildings, but that premise has never been explicitly admitted, with officials clinging to the notion that the collapse was expected but was not aided by means of explosive charges, because to admit to a controlled demolition would be to expose foreknowledge of 9/11 itself.

Whether Kerry is basing his response on inside knowledge or hearsay is irrelevant, the fact that a sitting United States Senator is openly contradicting the official 9/11 story as well as a multi-billion dollar insurance lawsuit strikes at the root of the controversy surrounding Building 7.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an accidental event caused by the fall of the twin towers.

EMT's, firefighters and first responders all knew the building was pulled, anyone with an ounce of common sense can watch the videos and understand that building's don't commit suicide - and yet Silverstein, the government, and their propaganda arm Popular Mechanics, are wedded to the myth that the structure fell as a result of fire damage. They are beholden to this explanation because any revision on their behalf would undermine the entire sequence of events on 9/11 and call into question other aspects of the official story.

Their credibility rests on sweeping the issue of WTC 7 under the rug, which makes it our responsibility to keep beating the Building 7 drum..............

..............Controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko was shown footage and building schematics of Building 7 by Dutch television and immediately concluded that its collapse was a result of deliberately placed explosives.

Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized building takes weeks of preparation. A building as large as WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, must have taken at least as long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished in response to fires spread from the twin towers is not a satisfactory response, as the building could not have been set up for unexpected demolition in only a few hours, much less while fires burned inside. All personnel were withdrawn from the area very early, meaning the explosives which can clearly be seen in the videos were placed days or weeks before 9/11.

Kerry was also asked about the research of Dr. Steven Jones, who has tested both samples of steel from the twin towers as well as recovered dust, which have both tested positive for the chemical signature of Thermate, which is used to cut support beams in localized reactions during a controlled demolition..................

The world trade towers fell in exactly the same manner ( complete freefalls ). No steel framed building had EVER collapsed from fire damage IN HISTORY until September 11 2001 when THREE ( the twin towers and building 7 ) fell within the space of seven hours. The US Perpetrators of these controlled demolitions are hoping that a critical mass of awarness is never realized, and so far, the many ILLUSIONS they have spun, are working.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC41

Wizard 628April 19, 2007 06:04PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 369April 19, 2007 06:21PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 347April 19, 2007 06:43PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 412April 19, 2007 07:13PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 369April 19, 2007 09:23PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 438April 23, 2007 12:43PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 373April 23, 2007 02:09PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 404April 24, 2007 05:14PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 338April 26, 2007 08:11PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 390May 01, 2007 07:41PM

Re: SC41

Rick 447May 02, 2007 12:35PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 340May 02, 2007 07:46PM

Re: SC41

Rick 369May 03, 2007 12:20AM

Re: SC41

Wizard 369May 04, 2007 05:24PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 455May 04, 2007 08:21PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 344May 04, 2007 08:58PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 410May 05, 2007 10:09PM

Re: SC41

Wizard 418May 09, 2007 02:06PM

Re: SC41

mojavegreen 775May 11, 2007 11:50AM

Re: SC41

Wizard 412May 09, 2007 04:06PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login