Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (100% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC40

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

April 04, 2007 11:24PM
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20070404&articleId=5274

Bush, Iran and Selective Outrage

One of the least endearing features of Washington’s political/media hierarchy is its propensity for selective outrage, like what is now coming from George W. Bush about the “inexcusable behavior” of the Iranian government in holding 15 British sailors whom Bush has labeled “hostages.”

This is the same President Bush who often mocks the very idea that international law should apply to him; he’s fond of the punch line: “International law? I better call my lawyer.” But Bush becomes a pious defender of international law when it suits his geopolitical interests.

The major U.S. news media predictably follows along, getting into an arms-crossed harrumph over foreigners trampling on the inviolate principles of international law, the same rules that should never constrain U.S. actions.

So, when British sailors were captured on March 23 after they may or may not have crossed over an ill-defined demarcation between Iraqi and Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf, the assumption in the U.S. media was that Iran must be wrong. After all, Bush has listed Iran as a charter member of the “axis of evil”; its leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a notorious hothead; and everyone knows the Brits always play by the rules.

Of course, left outside this narrow frame of reference was the gross violation of international law – the bloody invasion of Iraq in 2003 – that put the Brits there in the first place.

Back then, international law was deemed little more than a nuisance getting in the way of what President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair wanted to do, i.e. conquer Iraq, install a compliant government, "privatize" its resources, and threaten other countries in the region to get in line.

Bush regarded the United Nations Charter and its ban on aggressive war as some goofy experiment in multilateralism. Blair actually knew better. Though he recognized that the Iraq invasion would violate this fundamental tenet of international law, Blair went along anyway.

From a longer-range historical context, there were other facts that would need forgetting if one wanted to get worked up into a moral frenzy. These include British colonial domination of both Iraq and Iran, and the CIA’s role in overthrowing Iran’s elected government in 1953 and reinstalling the brutal Shah of Iran on the Peacock Throne.

The combined interventions by the United Kingdom and the United States may have cost the lives of hundreds of thousands – possibly millions – of Iraqis and Iranians over the past century, but somehow Blair and Bush have positioned themselves as the INNOCENT VICTIMS – at least as far as the Western press corps is concerned.......

.............Though these controversies about Bush’s disdain for international law are well known to the U.S. news media, the context disappeared again when press interest turned to the captured British sailors in late March 2007.

Suddenly, it was a new day with Bush and Blair fully committed to international law. Even a relatively minor Geneva transgression, such as filming captives eating, became a justification for unrestrained outrage.

Without any acknowledgement about their own abrogation of international law, the British and U.S. governments lifted these principles from the gutter, dusted them off and put them on a pedestal. THE GRAND HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER, George W. Bush, lectured other countries about “inexcusable behavior” – and no prominent Western journalist called him to account for his contradictions..................
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC40

Wizard 964April 03, 2007 10:51PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 629April 03, 2007 11:16PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 529April 03, 2007 11:30PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 596April 04, 2007 12:01AM

Re: SC40

Wizard 558April 04, 2007 01:01AM

Re: SC40

Wizard 603April 04, 2007 10:47PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 519April 04, 2007 11:06PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 541April 04, 2007 11:24PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 539April 09, 2007 11:23PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 537April 10, 2007 08:34PM

Re: SC40

mojavegreen 570April 10, 2007 09:51PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 467April 11, 2007 10:34PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 554April 11, 2007 11:00PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 574April 14, 2007 05:25PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 615April 14, 2007 06:00PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 498April 16, 2007 10:22PM

Re: SC40

Wizard 551April 18, 2007 10:00PM

Re: SC40

Paul P. 552April 19, 2007 01:00PM

Re: SC40

Rick 1131April 19, 2007 03:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login