Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (87% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC32

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

December 12, 2006 08:07PM
http://www.physorg.com/news85074285.html

Why a hydrogen economy doesn't make sense

In a recent study, fuel cell expert Ulf Bossel explains that a hydrogen economy is a wasteful economy. The large amount of energy required to isolate hydrogen from natural compounds (water, natural gas, biomass), package the light gas by compression or liquefaction, transfer the energy carrier to the user, plus the energy lost when it is converted to useful electricity with fuel cells, leaves around 25% for practical use — an unacceptable value to run an economy in a sustainable future. Only niche applications like submarines and spacecraft might use hydrogen.

“More energy is needed to isolate hydrogen from natural compounds than can ever be recovered from its use,” Bossel explains to PhysOrg.com. “Therefore, making the new chemical energy carrier form natural gas would not make sense, as it would increase the gas consumption and the emission of CO2. Instead, the dwindling fossil fuel reserves must be replaced by energy from renewable sources.”

While scientists from around the world have been piecing together the technology, Bossel has taken a broader look at how realistic the use of hydrogen for carrying energy would be. His overall energy analysis of a hydrogen economy demonstrates that high energy losses inevitably resulting from the laws of physics mean that a hydrogen economy will never make sense.

“The advantages of hydrogen praised by journalists (non-toxic, burns to water, abundance of hydrogen in the Universe, etc.) are misleading, because the production of hydrogen depends on the availability of energy and water, both of which are increasingly rare and may become political issues, as much as oil and natural gas are today,” says Bossel.

“There is a lot of money in the field now,” he continues. “I think that it was a mistake to start with a ‘Presidential Initiative’ rather with a thorough analysis like this one. Huge sums of money were committed too soon, and now even good scientists prostitute themselves to obtain research money for their students or laboratories—otherwise, they risk being fired. But the laws of physics are eternal and cannot be changed with additional research, venture capital or majority votes.”

Even though many scientists, including Bossel, predict that the technology to establish a hydrogen economy is within reach, its implementation will never make economic sense, Bossel argues.

“In the market place, hydrogen would have to compete with its own source of energy, i.e. with ("green"winking smiley electricity from the grid,” he says. “For this reason, creating a new energy carrier is a no-win solution. We have to solve an energy problem not an energy carrier problem." .......................
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC32

Wizard 1007December 11, 2006 09:26PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 587December 11, 2006 10:12PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 610December 12, 2006 07:22PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 617December 12, 2006 07:35PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 641December 12, 2006 07:58PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 844December 12, 2006 08:07PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 661December 13, 2006 09:01PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 717December 16, 2006 10:58PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 602December 16, 2006 11:55PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 923December 17, 2006 12:27PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 666December 19, 2006 07:56PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 698December 21, 2006 08:19PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 633December 21, 2006 08:50PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 662December 21, 2006 09:29PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 597December 27, 2006 10:26PM

Re: SC32

mojavegreen 667December 28, 2006 12:22PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 612December 29, 2006 10:02PM

Re: SC32

Wizard 1124December 29, 2006 10:48PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login