Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile Recent Messages

Deep Creek Hot Springs

The Moon is Waxing Crescent (2% of Full)


Advanced

Re: SC16

All posts are those of the individual authors and the owner of this site does not endorse them. Content should be considered opinion and not fact until verified independently.

May 22, 2006 01:43PM
Did you see the recent report on CNN, in which the administration released photo evidence that " supposedly " supports the " official accounting " of a 737 hitting the pentagon. These photo stills have been on the internet already, for a long time. In a couple of the still photos, the jet is seen as a completely unrecognizable blur. One still photo shows a tiny piece of what is purported as plane wreckage. So, a 737 hits a huge solid structure like the Pentagon, and thats the best they can do, its utterly ridiculous. Now ask yourself this. Why would the Pentagon, the administrative hub, of the one remaining super power nation left on the planet, not be completely monitered by all sorts of high tech video? And yet, this administration, after all the years since 9-11, puts out this recent CNN story, of essetially two still photos which contain nothing of reckognizable value in ascertaing just " what " hit the pentagon. Its just mindboggleing that its seriously offered up by this administration that these two blurred stills, represent the only video evidence available regarding this incident. Why, are all the confiscated videos from surrounding the Pentagon not made available to the public. If they truly want to show the truth, why continue to essentially hide the evidence. Why is photo evidence which would show a jetliner, hitting the pentagon, so top secret that it cannot be shown. I can see no other reason than, what would be seen on such a vido, or still photo evidence, does show something contrary to the purported official version of events at the Pentagon on 9-11. These are simple, straighforward questions, and the fact that the adminstration still offers nothing more as evidence of this event, than two photos with blurs proposed as a full sized jet, this nonsense, is very telling. Books like Crossing The Rubicon by Micheal Ruppert, and The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin, are both incredibly well researched, and documented in thier appraisel of how, behind the scenes, we came to an event like 9-11, and how this administration has proceeded from before this huge event, and after, in thier immoral conquest to try by unethical means, to grab control of what energy resources are remaing, by any means they deem necesary. If you would take the time to read these extensive documents, it becomes utterly clear that we are being governed by nothing less than criminals. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and thier oil club knew BEFORE 9-11 that we were heading for an energy crises. You cannot connect the dots of how their conquest proceeded, if you never inform yourself about just what the dots mean. The general public continues to swallow the bait, hook, line and sinker. Its increadible to watch, and illustrates just why nothing ever gets done about all the corruption, that is so much a part of our government, big money, and the corportation controlled world. Mark Twain wrote a book, On The Damned Human Race, discussing how corrupt people, and government were back in his time. Well, its clear folks, nothing has changed.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

SC16

Wizard 770May 15, 2006 11:06PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 363May 15, 2006 11:25PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 388May 17, 2006 10:52PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 407May 17, 2006 11:17PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 459May 18, 2006 10:00PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 409May 18, 2006 10:27PM

Radical new engine technology?

mojavegreen 388May 19, 2006 08:46AM

Re: SC16

Wizard 335May 19, 2006 11:35AM

Re: SC16

Wizard 447May 19, 2006 02:16PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 356May 19, 2006 02:36PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 403May 19, 2006 09:59PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 493May 19, 2006 11:18PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 399May 20, 2006 12:19AM

Re: SC16

Wizard 385May 22, 2006 12:13PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 360May 22, 2006 12:28PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 329May 22, 2006 01:43PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 383May 22, 2006 02:01PM

Re: SC16

Paul P. 411May 22, 2006 04:58PM

Re: SC16

Wizard 685May 22, 2006 07:32PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login